Legal Opinion
Totes-Isotoner Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided November 4, 2008No. Slip Op. 08-119; Court 07-00001PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM and ORDER
POGUE, Judge.
Totes-Isotoner Corporation (“Totes”) alleged in its complaint in this action that the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) illegally discriminates on the basis of gender and/or age by setting out different tariff rates for certain “Men’s” gloves as opposed to “other” gloves. The court dismissed Totes’s complaint in Totes-Isotoner Corp. v. United States, — CIT —, 569 F.Supp.2d 1315 (2008) (holding that Totes had standing to bring, and the court had jurisdiction to hear, Totes’s claim, but dismissing for failure to state a claim because the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Bray v. Alexandria Women's Health ClinicSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- William Hayden v. County of Nassau, United States of America and Nassau County Guardians Association, Defendants-Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Clintwood Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Totes-Isotoner Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Meridian Products, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
- Ad Hoc Utilities Group v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- Ford Motor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
- International Custom Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.