Legal Opinion

Gaertner v. 880 CORP.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided April 23, 1986No. 85-0653PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtScott, C.J.

The principal challenge on this appeal is to the propriety of the trial court's grant of a default judgment against 880 Corporation (880) for failure to appear at a scheduling conference. 880 contends that the trial court abused its discretion by granting a default judgment, alleges that certain notice requirements were not met, claims that the trial court erred by striking 880's answer, and challenges the damage award. We conclude that the record does not provide sufficient foundation to support the damage award; therefore, we reverse as to damages and remand for a new hearing. We affirm the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Gross v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Kranzush v. Badger State Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Hedtcke v. Sentry InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Neylan v. VorwaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Allis Chalmers Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Apex Electronics Corp. v. GeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Oneida County Department of Social Services v. Nicole W.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Haselow v. GauthierCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
  5. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. KellyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API