Legal Opinion

Neylan v. Vorwald

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1985No. 82-2051, 82-2052PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinmetz, J.

The issues in this case are whether a trial court, upon its own motion, may dismiss actions for failure to prosecute without giving actual notice to any party, and secondly, since such dismissals were ordered in this case, were the judgments void. If they are void, must they be set aside upon motion brought pursuant to sec. 806.07, Stats., 1 and what, if any, time limits might restrict the bringing of such motions.

These two related cases were consolidated by stipulation for purposes of appeal. Appeals were taken from orders entered by the Crawford county circuit court, the Honorable Michael…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Anderson National Bank v. LuckettSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Misco Leasing, Inc. v. James H. VaughnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  4. Albert A. Taft v. Donellan Jerome, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
  5. Latham v. Casey & King Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Village of Trempealeau v. MikrutWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Johnson v. Allis Chalmers Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Dimon v. MansyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. LeachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Barland v. Eau Claire CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API