Legal Opinion
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kelly
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided May 23, 2012No. 2011AP1654-DPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. PER CURIAM.
We review the report of the referee, Reserve Judge John B. Murphy, recommending that Attorney T. Christopher Kelly's license to practice law in Wisconsin be revoked, that he be required to pay $31,541.50 to the Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection (the Fund) as restitution for the amounts the Fund paid to Attorney Kelly's former clients due to his misconduct, and that he be required to pay the full costs of this disciplinary proceeding, which were $4,600.44 as of December 5, 2011. Because no appeal has been filed in this matter, our review proceeds pursuant to SCR 22.17(2).1
¶…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against InglimoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- Schneller v. St. Mary's Hospital Medical CenterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
- Gaertner v. 880 CORP.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
- Sentry Insurance v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Christopher S. PetrosWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Barry LeSieurWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Erika Anita CannadayWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Goldmann (In Re Goldmann)Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Terry L. ConstantWisconsin Supreme Court · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.