Legal Opinion
Bahr v. CAPELLA UNIVERSITY
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 9, 2010No. A08-1367PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*78OPINION
ANDERSON, G. BARRY, Justice.
This case arises from appellant Capella University’s employment termination of respondent Elen Bahr. Bahr brought an action in district court claiming that her employment termination was in retaliation for opposing discriminatory practices and that such retaliation violated the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA), Minn.Stat. §§ 363A.01-.41 (2008). Capella moved to dismiss Bahr’s suit for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, Minn. R. Civ. P. 12.02(e). Capella argued that Bahr failed to establish that Capella’s conduct was forbidden by the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Wilkerson v. New Media Technology Charter School Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Diane LEDERGERBER, Appellant, v. Gary STANGLER; Carmen Schultze, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Butler v. Alabama Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Torgerson v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Torgerson v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Quinn v. St. Louis CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Guimaraes v. SuperValu, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Laura L. Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.