Legal Opinion
Scheidecker v. Arvig Enterprises, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided November 9, 2000No. Civ. 99-1259 ADM/RLE, Civ. 99-1260 ADM/RLEPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MONTGOMERY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Because these two companion cases involve many of the same facts and legal analysis, the Court will discuss both cases in this combined Memorandum Opinion and Order.
On September 26, 2000, the undersigned United States District Judge heard Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 51] in the Von Ruden case. Defendants seek summary judgment on all of Von Ruden’s remaining claims: 1 (1) discriminatory disparate treatment based on her gender and pregnancy in violation of Title VII; (2) discriminatory disparate treatment…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Bradley v. CAL. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATIONCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Collins-Pearcy v. Mediterranean Shipping Co. (USA)District Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
- Woodford v. Community Action of Greene County, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Schubert v. Bethesda Health Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2004
- White v. GoldenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.