Steroco, Inc. v. Szymanski
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtKeller, J.
*77 The defendant Joseph J. Szymanski, Jr., 1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting a permanent injunction requested by the plaintiff, Steroco, Inc., in its action seeking private enforcement of the zoning regulations of the town of North Branford. On appeal, the defendant claims that this court should vacate the permanent injunction on the basis of the following: (1) the court improperly found that the defendant had committed a zoning violation; (2) the court erred by applying an improper standard in deciding whether to grant the permanent injunction; and (3) the court…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Cummings v. TrippSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Bauer v. Waste Management of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Bauer v. Waste Management of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Fitzgerald v. Merard Holding Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Simko v. ErvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Giglio v. ArdohainConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
- Lane v. CashmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Pfister v. Madison Beach Hotel, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
- Rosenthal Law Firm, LLC v. CohenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019