Legal Opinion
Abbey v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 21, 2014No. 2013-5009PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge TARANTO.
Opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part filed by Circuit Judge O’MALLEY.
TARANTO, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs in this case — the “controllers” — are or were employed by the Federal Aviation Administration as air-traffic-control specialists or traffic-management coordinators. The controllers sued the United States in the Court of Federal Claims, alleging that the FAA’s policies governing how to compensate them when they worked overtime failed to comply with the time-and-a-half-payment requirement of the Fair Labor Standards Act of…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- King v. St. Vincent's HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Martin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Gonda v. DonahoeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Adair v. Bureau of Customs and Border ProtectionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- ElHelbawy v. PritzkerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Johnson v. Bolden, Jr.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.