Legal Opinion
John Doe, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 11, 2006No. 05-5104PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHALL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff John Doe and a class of similarly situated individuals (hereinafter collectively, “the Doe plaintiffs”) appeal from the September 17, 2004 judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims dismissing their complaint. Doe v. United States, No. 98-896 C, slip op. (Fed.Cl. Sept. 17, 2004) (“Doe Summary Judgment Order”). The Doe plaintiffs are Department of Justice (“DOJ”) attorneys who sued the government for alleged violations of the overtime provisions of the Federal Employees Pay Act of 1945 (“FEPA”), ch. 212, 59 Stat. 295 (codified as amended at 5 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Schweiker v. HansenSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Jan's Helicopter Service, Inc. v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Metz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Maine Community Health Options v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Barnick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Adair v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.