Legal Opinion
Gardiner, Kamya & Associates, P.C. v. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided November 8, 2006No. 2005-1524PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DYK, Circuit Judge.
Gardiner, Kamya & Associates, P.C. (“GKA”) appeals from a decision of the Board of Contract Appeals (“BCA”) of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”), denying GKA’s claim for a retroactive pricing adjustment in its contract with HUD. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
On May 14, 1993, GKA and HUD entered into indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contract No. DU100C000018170, under whose terms HUD agreed to purchase between $2,000,000 and $28,000,000 of various accounting services for the purpose of “ensuring] the integrity of [HUD’s] Single Family Mortgage…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McAbee Construction, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- C. Sanchez and Son, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- John H. Dalton, Secretary of the Navy v. Cessna Aircraft CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Edward R. Marden Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- New Jersey v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Linc Government Services, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- North Star Alaska Housing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Ace American Insurance v. Freeport Welding & Fabricating, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- LAI Services, Inc. v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Furniture By Thurston v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.