Legal Opinion
Rutledge v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided November 14, 1986No. S-1096, S-1128PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BURKE, Justice.
This appeal arises from a wrongful termination action filed by William Rutledge against Alyeska Pipeline Service Company (Alyeska). Rutledge appeals from both the trial court’s refusal to allow him to amend his complaint, and the grant of directed verdicts to Alyeska on a number of his claims. We affirm the trial court on all issues.
I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW
A. Facts
On October 4, 1982, Rutledge was working the night shift in an Alyeska control room. Rutledge had the window of the control room open, but Crewman Mike Ov-erson closed the window because he was cold.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Gram v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Holiday Inns of America, Inc. v. PeckAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Mitford v. De LasalaAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- City of Fairbanks v. NesbettAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Jones v. Central Peninsula General HospitalAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
- Luedtke v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Betz v. Chena Hot Springs GroupAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Gamble v. Northstore PartnershipAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Holland v. Union Oil Co. of California, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.