Legal Opinion

Kooly v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1998No. S-7207PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION '

MATTHEWS, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Three-year-old Daniel Craig drowned when he slipped into a partially-frozen creek at the bottom of a popular sledding hill. We must decide whether the State of Alaska can be held liable for his death because the sledding hill was part of a state right-of-way. We conclude that it cannot because the State does not owe a duty of care to sledders on its rights-of-way.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

On December 12, 1993, Shannon Kooly took her son Daniel and several other children sledding at an area known as the Beaver Creek sledding hill. The sledding hill is…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. D. S. W. ex rel. R. M. W. v. Fairbanks North Star Borough School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Wright v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Division of Corrections, Department of Health & Social Services v. NeakokAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. City of Kotzebue v. McLeanAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  5. R.E. ex rel. D.E. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Guerrero Ex Rel. Guerrero v. Alaska Housing Finance Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Lynden Inc. v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. SandsnessAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  4. DeNardo v. GCI Communication Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Hurn Ex Rel. D.H. v. GreenwayAlaska Supreme Court · 2013

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API