Legal Opinion

Yokley v. Chicago Transit Authority

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 16, 1999No. 1-98-2729PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gallagher

This appeal arises from an action brought by plaintiff Myron Yokley against the Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) for injuries he allegedly suffered when his leg was caught in the doors of a CTA bus. The circuit court granted the CTA’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed plaintiff’s action for failure to comply with the notice requirements of section 41 of the Metropolitan Transit Authority Act (70 ILCS 3605/41 (West 1996)). On appeal plaintiff argues that his complaint was improperly dismissed because it substantially complied with the notice requirements of section 41. We affirm.

Plaintif…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Purtill v. HessIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Kennedy v. Four Boys Labor Services, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  3. Ouimette v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Repaskey v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Niziolek v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Cedeno v. GumbinerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  2. Puszkarska v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  3. Cione v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  4. Curtis v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  5. Fields v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API