Legal Opinion

Fields v. Chicago Transit Authority

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 20, 2001No. 1 — 00—0592PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cohen

Plaintiff, Annie Fields, filed a negligence complaint against defendant, Chicago Transit Authority (CTA), and its agent, Tom Deyamfer, seeking damages for injuries she sustained while she was a passenger on a CTA bus. The trial court dismissed plaintiffs cause of action pursuant to section 2 — 619 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Code) (735 ILCS 5/2 — 619 (West 1998)) finding plaintiff had failed to comply with the notice requirements of section 41 of the Metropolitan Transit Authority Act (Act) (70 ILCS 3605/41 (West 1998)). On appeal, plaintiff argues that the CTA should have been precluded…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kedzie and 103rd Currency Exchange, Inc. v. HodgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Zedella v. GibsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. YapejianIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. FreyerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. Stone v. Department of Employment Security Board of ReviewIllinois Supreme Court · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cedeno v. GumbinerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  2. Puszkarska v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  3. High v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  4. Cedeno v. GumbinerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  5. High v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API