Legal Opinion

Repaskey v. Chicago Transit Authority

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1975No. 45724PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schaefer

The plaintiff, Anna Repaskey, commenced this action against the Chicago Transit Authority and Midland Elevat- or Company, which was alleged to have a contract with the C.T.A. to maintain its escalators. The circuit court of Cook County dismissed the action against the C.T.A. and thereafter found the issues in favor of Midland Elevator Company. The plaintiff appealed from the judgment dismissing the action against the C.T.A., and the Appellate Court, First District, affirmed (9 Ill. App. 3d 897). We allowed leave to appeal.

The action was dismissed on the ground that the plaintiff had failed to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. City of TuscolaIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Housewright v. City of LaHarpeIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Helle v. BrushIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Repaskey v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Fujimura v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Dunbar v. ReiserIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Niziolek v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  4. Searcy v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  5. Yokley v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API