Legal Opinion

Niziolek v. Chicago Transit Authority

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 12, 1993No. 1-91-2368PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Buckley

Scott Niziolek (plaintiff) brought a personal injury action against the Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) and Leroy Carter (Carter) to recover damages for injuries he allegedly sustained when his automobile was struck from behind by a CTA bus driven by Carter. The trial court granted the CTA’s motion to dismiss (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1991, ch. 110, par. 2 — 619 (now 735 ILCS 5/2 — 619 (West 1992))) on the ground that plaintiff’s claim was barred because he failed to give proper written notice to the secretary of the board and to the CTA’s general counsel within six months of the accident as required…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Greer v. Illinois Housing Development AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Fumarolo v. Chicago Board of EducationIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Rickey v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Reynolds v. City of TuscolaIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Saragusa v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1976

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Joseph v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  2. Yokley v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  3. Orr v. EdgarAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  4. Wheatley v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  5. Curtis v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API