Overly v. Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HAERLE, J.
I. Introduction
Robert and Louise Overly (the Overlys) sued Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc. (Ingalls) and others for personal injury and loss of consortium resulting from Robert’s exposure to asbestos. A jury found Ingalls and another defendant, Avondale Industries, Inc. (Avondale), guilty of negligence and awarded the Overlys substantial damages. In this appeal, 1 Ingalls argues: (1) the trial court made erroneous evidentiary rulings which mandate reversal of the judgment; (2) Ingalls was denied a fair trial because the jury was not given evidence pertaining to defendants who did…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fein v. Permanente Medical GroupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Reichardt v. HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- United States v. Alice L. EnglishCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- American Drug Stores, Inc. v. StrohCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Burke v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Payne v. Eighth Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 2002
- Hackett v. John Crane, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- Williams v. Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of Cal., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Hall Ex Rel. Hall v. RodricksNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Payne v. Eighth Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.