Legal Opinion
Keppelman v. Heikes
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 4, 1952No. Civ. 15091PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
In an action on three counts (1) for the reasonable value of work done and materials furnished, (2) an open book account, and (3) an account stated, plaintiff recovered judgment on the first two counts in the sum of
$1,302.18, against defendants Peden and Salinas Newspapers, Inc. * The last named defendant appeals.
Questions Presented
1. Sufficiency of evidence.
2. Alleged errors in admission and rejection of evidence.
3. Alleged abuse of discretion by court in refusing to reopen cause to take a deposition.
4. Book account.
1. Sufficiency of Evidence
Taking the facts and the reasonable inferences…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Engstrom v. Auburn Automobile Sales Corp.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Stanhope v. Los Angeles College of ChiropracticCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Weber v. Marine Cooks' & Stewards' Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Hill v. Citizens National Trust & Savings Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Wainwright Trust Co. v. KinderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- De Angeles v. Roos Bros., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Sanchez v. Bay General HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Westerholm v. 20th Century InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Lee v. Helmco, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Meredith v. MarksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.