Legal Opinion
Lee v. Helmco, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 5, 1962No. Civ. 25675PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.
This is an appeal from the judgment entered upon a verdict of the jury in favor of the plaintiff and against defendant Helmco, Inc.
On October 25, 1956, plaintiff filed a complaint for damages for fraud, wherein two causes of action were set forth. The first cause of action alleged that defendant Scanlan was the agent of defendant Helmco, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “Helmco”) and was acting within the purpose and scope of such agency; that Scanlon made certain promises and representations “. . . without any intention of performing them, or any of them, at the time said promises and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Estate of TeedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- New v. NewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Donnelly v. San Francisco Bridge Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hartong v. Partake, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Valentine v. Plum Healthcare Grp., LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- South Sacramento Drayage Co. v. Campbell Soup Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Spahn v. Guild Industries Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- Kelley v. R. F. Jones Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.