Pascoe v. Mentor Graphics Corp.
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KING, District Judge.
The Honorable Janice M. Stewart, United States Magistrate Judge, filed Findings and Recommendation on November 2, 2001. The matter is before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (8th Cir.1983); See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.
Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Shepard v. City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2011
- Huitt v. Optum Health ServicesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2016
- Whitley v. City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2009
- Mathis v. Housing Authority of Umatilla CountyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2002
- Scott v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.