Legal Opinion
Shepard v. City of Portland
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided October 31, 2011No. Civil No. 09-0021-AAPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
AIKEN, Chief Judge:
Defendants the City of Portland, Suzanne Kahn, and Randy Johnson each move for summary judgment on plaintiff Kelly Shepard’s employment discrimination and retaliation claims. See Fed. R.Civ.P. 56. For the reasons set forth below, Suzanne Kahn’s and Randy Johnson’s motions are granted; the City of Portland’s motion is granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
Defendant the City of Portland (the “City”) is a municipal corporation organized pursuant to state law. Defendants Suzanne Kahn (“Kahn”) and Randy Johnson (“Johnson”), as well as plaintiff, work for…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Lindsey v. Clatskanie People's Utility DistrictDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2015
- Daniel v. Oregon Health & Sciences UniversityDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2017
- Bushfield v. DonahoeDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2012
- Siring v. Oregon State Board of Higher Education ex rel. Eastern Oregon UniversityDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012
- Betsy Goren, on behalf of the Estate of Marjorie Goren v. SMA Hub, Inc.; Hub Business Trust; NV Partners, LLC; Jonathan Walker; and Northwest BankDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.