McLean v. Llewellyn Iron Works
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. Curtis D. Wilbur, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Upon a reconsideration of this case on a second rehearing we are of the opinion that the judgment and order denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial should be affirmed on the grounds stated in the opinion originally tiled, which is as follows:
The plaintiff is the owner of five lots of land hounded by and fronting on Railroad, Magdalena, and San Fernando streets in the city of Los Angeles. The defendant is the owner or lessee of lands on the other side of Magdalena street. We would give the directions, but the points of the compass aré not shown on the plat in the transcript, and nothing…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Eachus v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Lexington & Ohio Rail Road v. ApplegateCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1839
- Fisher v. ZumwaltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Prescott v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Hargro v. HodgdonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Strong v. SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Lane v. San Diego Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
- Cushing - Wetmore Co. v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Williams v. Blue Bird Laundry Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.