Fisher v. Zumwalt
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
Action to abate a nuisance and for damages. Plaintiff obtained judgment, and from this judgment and an order denying his motion for a new trial defendant appeals.
The plaintiff and defendant are neighbors and have for a long time lived in the same community. In the year 1893 the defendant erected on his own land a creamery for the purpose of manufacturing butter and cheese. This creamery is located near a public highway and in a thickly populated portion of the county of Tulare, there being many farmhouses in the vicinity and some eighty people living within a radius of three miles…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Francis v. . SchoellkopfNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Lansing v. SmithCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1829
- Cranford v. . Tyrrell.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
- County of Yolo v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Sweetser v. DobbinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Venuto v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- Hulbert v. California Etc. Cement Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Jardine v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Rynsburger v. Dairymen's Fertilizer Cooperative, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Miles v. A. Arena & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.