Hargro v. Hodgdon
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Temple, C.
— Appeal from judgment and order denying defendant's motion for new trial.
*626This action is brought to abate a nuisance; to remove an obstruction placed by defendant in what is alleged to he a public alley, extending from Sixteenth Street northerly to Fifteenth, through the block bounded by these streets and Mission Street and Julian Avenue, in the city and county of San Francisco. The alleged alley is known as Lida Place or Court.
From the complaint it appears that plaintiff Selina Hargro" jowns a lot extending from Julian Avenue to Lida Place, and that defendant has erected a house in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Webb v. Portland Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1838
- Bigley v. NunanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
- Blanc v. KlumpkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Schulte v. North Pacific Transportation Co.California Supreme Court · 1875
- Aram v. SchallenbergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Union Transportation Co. v. Sacramento CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Patton v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Beals v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Brown v. ReaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.