Legal Opinion

Murdock v. Fisher Finance Corporation

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 24, 1926No. Docket No. 5435PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.

Plaintiff, a minor of the age of nineteen, sued to rescind his contract with the defendant for the purchase of an automobile. The plaintiff recovered judgment for $615.97 with interest and the defendant has appealed on a typewritten transcript.

On June 17, 1924, the parties executed their written contract whereby the plaintiff agreed to purchase from the defendant a Stutz automobile for the stipulated purchase price of $917.12, ,$450i 2thereof to be paid upon the execution of the agreement and the balance in equal monthly installments of $51.90 each. Plaintiff satisfied the initial payment by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cal. Farm & Fruit Co. v. Schiappa-PietraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Rice v. . ButlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. Bray v. LoweryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Blahnik v. Small Farms Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Petit v. ListonOregon Supreme Court · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kent v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Canepa v. Sun Pacific, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Loomis v. Imperial Motors, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Konda v. LamkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Lakey v. CaldwellIdaho Supreme Court · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API