Legal Opinion
Loomis v. Imperial Motors, Inc.
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided November 2, 1964No. 9487PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McQUADE, Justice.
On August 30, 1963, the plaintiff-appellant, Loomis, an unmarried minor over the age of eighteen, purchased an automobile, paying cash and receiving credit for a motorcycle as a trade-in. Loomis was a member of the United States Navy temporarily assigned in Idaho Falls, Idaho, at the time of the purchase. Within two weeks after purchasing the automobile, Loomis drove to his permanent residence of Yuba City, California. Imperial Motors, Inc., knew Loomis was from California and that he had driven the car from Idaho Falls to California and the return. At this time Loomis…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Armored Car Serv. Inc. v. First Nat. Bank of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
- Brown v. WoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Maddock v. RiggsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- Woods-Drury, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Fulcher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Christensen v. HooverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Torix v. AllredIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
- Schoenholz v. HinzmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
- Jenkins v. Equipment Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1994
- Smith v. Idaho Peterbilt, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.