Legal Opinion

Ashburn v. AIG Financial Advisors, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 6, 2015No. A138620PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHMAN, J.

Plaintiffs and appellants (appellants) are five former employees of Pacific Bell who took early retirement, with the option to take a pension or a lump-sum payment. All appellants chose the lump sum, persuaded to do so by respondent Sharon Kearney, with whom each appellant had significant interaction, having first learned of her from presentations made at the Pacific Bell premises. And all appellants came to be clients of Kearney, in connection with which they signed some documents — exactly what documents and how they came to be signed is the subject of vigorous dispute —…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Rosenthal v. Great Western Financial Securities Corp.California Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Freeman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Cox v. Bonni, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Sanford v. RasnickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Ahn v. Sanger CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. Ahn v. Sanger CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. Austin v. Los Angeles Unified School Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2016

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API