Legal Opinion

Ruiz v. Moss Bros. Auto Group

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 23, 2014No. E057529PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant and appellant, Moss Bros. Auto Group, Inc. (Moss Bros.), appeals from an order denying its petition to compel arbitration of the employment-related and putative class action, representative, and individual claims of its service technician employee, plaintiff and respondent, Ernesto Ruiz. The trial court denied the petition on the ground Moss Bros, did not meet its burden of proving the parties had an agreement to arbitrate the controversy. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1281.2.) No statement of decision was requested or issued (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 632, 1291), but…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Rosenthal v. Great Western Financial Securities Corp.California Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Pinnacle Museum Tower Ass'n v. Pinnacle Market Development (US), LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  5. People v. GoldsmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Espejo v. Southern California Permanente Medical GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Correia v. NB Baker Elec., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. Nanavati v. Adecco USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  4. Mwithiga v. Uber Techs., Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2019
  5. Sprunk v. Prisma LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API