Legal Opinion

McCampbell v. Cavis

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1897No. 1241PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from, the County Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtBissell, J.

This judgment which Cavis obtained against McCampbell for commissions on the sale of a ranch is assailed because the contract is supposed to be so tainted with dishonesty as to prevent its enforcement and because the court after verdict permitted the plaintiff to dismiss the action as to one of the defendants and take judgment against the other. The case was tried originally before a justice of the peace, appealed to the county court and tried by a jury which found a verdict against the appellant.

A very brief statement of the case will suffice to explain it, and this will of itself afford…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mattison v. ChildsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1879
  2. Irwine v. WoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
  3. Marriott v. CliseSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  4. Miller v. BlakeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1881
  5. Miles v. MaysSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miller v. KinselColorado Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Burgess v. ColeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  3. Miller v. KinselColorado Court of Appeals · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API