Legal Opinion

Miller v. Kinsel

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1904No. 2488Published

Error to the County Court of Otero County.

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

This action is before us upon a writ of error to the county court of Otero county, where judgment was rendered against plaintiff in error, upon the verdict of a jury, on an appeal from a judgment of a justice court, against plaintiff in error’ and two others.. The action was upon a joint and several promissory note.

Defense, statute of limitations.

To avoid the bar of the statute, plaintiff testified, that shortly prior to the commencement of the action Miller said to him, “We owe it and I will have to pay it.”

It is conceded that the reference is to the particular promissory note in suit.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thomas v. CareySupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  2. Fitzgerald v. BurkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  3. Adams v. TuckerColorado Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Morrell v. FerrierSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
  5. Wilson v. WelchColorado Court of Appeals · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API