Legal Opinion

Irwine v. Wood

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 15, 1884PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from District Court of Gunnison County. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

The point relied upon by appellants for reversal of the judgment is, that the court erred in sustaining the demurrer to the complaint, on the ground of misjoinder of the defendants.

The suit was upon a written contract, one clause of which was as follows: “That the said Burchinell, Wood and Clark, parties of the first part (each for himself and *478not for the others, and in so far as his interest may appear in said claims), agree to furnish provisions to said Irwine and Jerome, the parties of the second part to this contract,” etc.

The complaint was demurred to on the ground (among others) of a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Parker v. JacksonNew York Supreme Court · 1852
  3. People v. LoveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Decker v. TrillingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. MetschanOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Farncomb v. SternSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  3. Stephens v. ParvinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1904
  4. Jones v. MossIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Berry v. FrenchColorado Court of Appeals · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API