Legal Opinion

Miles v. Mays

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from District Court of Arapahoe Coimty.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Helm

Mays, the appellee, brought suit and recovered judgment against Miles, the appellant, for commission earned in procuring a purchaser for certain real estate in the city of Denver. The property in question belonged to Emma O. Whitsitt, for whom Miles acted as agent.

The proof establishes the fact that Mays furnished a purchaser for the premises in accordance with the terms of his contract with Miles, The affirmative testimony of Mays, supplemented by that of Dr. Eisner, the would-be purchaser, and the admissions of Miles, clearly show that Eisner stood ready to take the property at the pjñce…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Joe Hodges Transfer & Storage, Co. v. KeeffeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  2. McCampbell v. CavisColorado Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. McNeil Higgins Co. v. Old Dominion S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1916
  4. McCampbell v. CavisColorado Court of Appeals · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API