Legal Opinion

Miller v. Blake

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 15, 1881PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to District Court of Boulder County. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

The suit below was upon a joint and several bond.

The surviving obligor and. the administratrix of the deceased joint obligor, the plaintiffs in error herein, were *119made the defendants. After verdict for the plaintiff below, the defendants moved in arrest of judgment on the ground of misjoinder of parties defendant, and thereupon the plaintiff moved to dismiss the action as to the surviving obligor. This latter motion was allowed by the court, the motion in arrest of judgment was overruled, and judgment rendered against the administratrix as such, the judgment to be paid out of the estate of…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. McCampbell v. CavisColorado Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Stuart v. County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. First National Bank of Plainville v. RileySupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  4. McCampbell v. CavisColorado Court of Appeals · 1897
  5. Stuart v. County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API