Kenalos v. H. v. Greene Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
The exception to the order that the cases be tried together lacks merit. The discretionary authority of the trial court to make such an order is not now an open question (Genest v. Company, 75 N. H. 365), and the case shows nothing even tending to prove that the discretion was improperly exercised or that any injustice was done the defendant.
The exception in the Koustas case to the refusal to direct a verdict for the defendant on the ground that this plaintiff disposed of his stock, and later, for the purpose of enabling himself to bring the suit, reacquired it, must be overruled. If such a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Karamanou v. H. v. Greene Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1922
- Genest v. Odell Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1909
- Dow v. LathamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1922
- Fernald v. FernaldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1921
3Cited by6 opinions
- Carbone v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
- Masterson v. Berlin Street RailwaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
- Doherty v. BartlettCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1936
- Gagnon v. FrankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
- Doherty v. BartlettCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.