Masterson v. Berlin Street Railway
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
When one is injured by joint wrongdoers, a settlement with one of them is presumptively in full satisfaction for the injury. The amount paid presumably represents the injured party’s claim or estimate of the extent of his damages. And a release given to one wrongdoer in satisfaction of"an injury is to be construed as showing payment in full for the damage done. Carpenter v. Company, 78 N. H. 118. Authorities are not needed to support the statement that in such case the other parties are thereby released since the injured party may have no more than satisfaction for the injury. But if the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Colburn v. GrotonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1889
- Carpenter v. W. H. McElwain Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1916
- Spaulding v. MayoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1923
- City Savings Bank v. WhittleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1885
- Collins v. BensonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ash v. MortensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Black v. MartinMontana Supreme Court · 1930
- Cozine v. Hawaiian Catamaran, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1966
- Esser v. BropheySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Waters v. HedbergSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.