Legal Opinion
Doherty v. Bartlett
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided February 12, 1936No. 3052PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PETERS, District Judge.
■ These are separate actions brought in the District Court of New Hampshire for money had and received by Fred G. Bartlett, Leon S. Knowlton, and Joseph O. Tremblay, all of Manchester in the state of New Hampshire, against Henry L. Doher‘ty of the city of New York and state of New York, doing business under the name and style of Henry L. Doherty & Co. In each action the plaintiff seeks to recover money paid for stocks, which it is alleged were illegally sold in New Flampshirc in violation of chapter 202 of the Session Laws of 1917, entitled “An Act to protect the public…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Armstrong v. TolerSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
- Merrick Et Al. v. N. W. Halsey & Company Et Al., and the Weis Fibre Container CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Caldwell v. Sioux Falls Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Kneeland v. EmertonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Beck v. BeckTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Manchester Bank v. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1980
- Martin v. SteubnerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1979
- Norton v. McOskerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Stern v. National City Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.