Carbone v. Boston & Maine Railroad
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.
The defendant seasonably moved for nonsuits and directed verdicts in both cases. These motions were denied and the defendant excepted. In support of these exceptions it is now argued: 1. That “there was no evidence from which the jury could reasonably have found that the defendant was negligent”; 2. That the “plaintiff Dion was negligent as a matter of law.” Both of these arguments are without merit.
The accident happened May 25, 1934, at about half past nine in the evening, upon a grade crossing in the city of Concord, where a highway known as Sewall’s Falls Road crosses the defendant’s…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Story v. Concord & Montreal RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1900
- Collins v. HustisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1920
- Demars v. Glen Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1892
- Jones v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
- Stocker v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Strom v. Des Moines & Central Iowa Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1957
- Dowling v. L. H. Shattuck, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941
- Jenkins v. Wabash Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Dreyer v. Otter Tail Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Brigham v. Hudson Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.