Legal Opinion
Doherty v. Bartlett
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided March 10, 1936No. 3052PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BINGHAM, Circuit Judge.
The defendant has presented a motion for rehearing. The ground of the motion is that this court, in its opinion, did not state whether or not it overruled its prior decision in Doherty v. McAuliffe (C.C.A.) 74 F.(2d) 800, 803. The reason is not far to seek.
In Doherty v. McAuliffe this court had under consideration the construction and application of section 8 of chapter 110A of the General Laws of Massachusetts (Ter.Ed.), and section 15 of that chapter. Section 8 prohibited a registered dealer from selling securities in that state on “an instalment or partial payment…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bowditch v. New England Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
- Geer v. PutnamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
- Karamanou v. H. v. Greene Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1922
- Edgerly v. HaleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1901
- M. A. Albertson & Co. v. ShentonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Manchester Bank v. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1980
- Stern v. National City Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1938
- Arsenault v. Realty Funding Corp. (In re Arsenault)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 1995