Legal Opinion

Sistrom v. Anderson

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 10, 1942No. Civ. 13182PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANSON, J. pro tem.

This is an action for damages for breach of contract, in which the question for decision is whether a written cancellation of the contract sued upon is binding upon the parties to it.

Appellant, who was plaintiff below, for some ten years, has operated a ranch in Arizona where he raises a considerable number of turkeys. During this same period the defendants, as partners, have been engaged in the retail and wholesale meat business at Long Beach. It was the custom of the defendants to purchase in other states, among them Arizona, their annual holiday supply of turkeys. In…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miller Cattle Co. v. MatticeArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Pleasant v. Arizona Storage & Distributing Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Lundvall v. HughesArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Potter v. Home Owners' Loan Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1937
  5. J. D. Halstead Lumber Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Rich & Whillock, Inc. v. Ashton Development, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. Colvin v. Superior Equipment CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Grant v. the Aerodraulics Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Sass v. HankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API