Legal Opinion

J. D. Halstead Lumber Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1931No. Civil No. 2986PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

On March 12, 1923, one Jay J. Garfield, hereinafter called the contractor, entered into a written contract with George H. M. Luhrs and Catherina M. Luhrs, his wife, to construct a building in Phoenix. The Luhrs demanded that he furnish a building bond in the sum of $410,000 for the faithful performance of the contract, and he applied to the Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, a corporation, hereinafter called plaintiff, for such bond. Be fore plaintiff executed the building bond it required the contractor and J. D. Halstead Lumber Company, a corporation, hereinafter called defendant, to…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. BeebeSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Arizona Binghampton Copper Co. v. DicksonArizona Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Preston v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Brutinel v. NygrenArizona Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Swinnerton v. Argonaut Land & Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1896

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tucson Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Aetna Investment Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Travelers Insurance v. BreeseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  3. Pagel v. PumphreyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  4. Sistrom v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Sentry Insurance v. Davison Fuel & Dock Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API