Legal Opinion
Sass v. Hank
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 14, 1951No. Civ. 18565PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
On November 20, 1945, plaintiffs prepared and executed a written contract whereby they agreed to loan to defendants 46 Kodachrome negatives to be used for the purpose of manufacturing a type of greeting card called “Claytoons.” Omitting immaterial passages, the contract is as follows;
“1. This contract shall be for the period of two years from the date of this letter. Both parties agree to give 60 days written notice from expiration date for cancellation. In the event of no written notice, the contract shall become renewed automatically for an additional two years. . . .
“6. The California…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Barham v. BarhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- United Iron Works v. Outer Harbor Dock & Wharf Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Barnhart Aircraft, Inc. v. PrestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Grant v. the Aerodraulics Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
- De La Beckwith v. SheldonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Schmidt v. MacCo Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Warren A. Ott, and Mortgage Services of Norfolk, Inc., a Corporation v. Home Savings & Loan Association, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- D. L. Godbey & Sons Construction Co. v. DeaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Committee to Save Beverly Highlands Homes Ass'n v. Beverly Highlands Homes Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Crow v. PEG Construction Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1957
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.