Legal Opinion

Colvin v. Superior Equipment Company

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1964No. 7147PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERNSTEIN, Justice.

Plaintiff-appellee brought this action against defendant-appellant to recover a deficiency as authorized by A.R.S. § 44 — 322, arising from the repossession sale of a power shovel under a conditional sale contract. The defendant filed an affirmative defense and counterclaim, based primarily on the allegation that the shovel was not new, as represented, but had a defectively welded replacement part which had broken down in operation causing a serious accident on June 6, 1957. This accident delayed performance of the defendant’s construction contract for dam work near Show…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. In Re Balke's EstateArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Davidson v. WeeArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Crystal Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. CatheyArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  5. O. S. Stapley Co. v. RogersArizona Supreme Court · 1923

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. OS Stapley Company v. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Nemeth v. Abonmarche Development, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Kammert Bros. Enterprises, Inc. v. Tanque Verde Plaza Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Tucson Industries, Incorporated v. SchwartzArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Bryant v. Continental Conveyor & Equipment Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1988

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API