Consumers Power Co. v. Public Service Commission
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.
We granted leave in these cases to determine whether defendant Michigan Public Service Commission (PSC) exceeded its statutory authority in ordering the Detroit Edison Company and Consumers Power Company to engage in “retail wheeling.” We hold that the PSC lacks the authority to order retail wheeling. Therefore, we reverse the Court of Appeals and vacate the PSC order implementing the experimental retail wheeling program.
*152I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL POSTURE
In 1992, the Association of Businesses Advocating Tariff Equity (abate) petitioned the PSC for an experimental retail wheeling…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State ex rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Oakland County Board v. Michigan Property & Casualty Guaranty Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- McAuley v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Department of Natural Resources v. SeamanMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- City of Livonia v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Koontz v. Ameritech Services, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- MacOmb County Prosecutor v. MurphyMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
- Sands Appliance Services, Inc v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Feyz v. Mercy Memorial HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.