Legal Opinion

MacOmb County Prosecutor v. Murphy

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 2001No. Docket 114444PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, C.J.

We granted leave in this case to consider whether defendant violated the incompatible offices act, MCL 15.181 et seq., by simultaneously holding positions as the delinquent personal property tax coordinator in the Macomb County treasurer’s office and as an elected member of the Harrison Township Board of Trustees. On review of the incompatible offices act as a whole, we conclude that the phrase “public offices held by a public official,” MCL 15.181(b), encompasses positions of public employment. However, we conclude that defendant’s positions are not inherently incompatible because only a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sun Valley Foods Co. v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Farrington v. Total Petroleum, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Smith v. Globe Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  4. City of Grand Rapids v. CrockerMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance v. Marlette Homes, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. Burkhardt v. BaileyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. People v. MartinMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Driver v. NainiMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Meyer & Anna Prentis Family Foundation, Inc. v. Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. People v. WilliamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API