Koontz v. Ameritech Services, Inc
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, C.J.
This case requires that we interpret a statute directing coordination of unemployment benefits with pension benefits. Plaintiff received a lump-sum pension payment under an employer-funded retirement plan. When plaintiff sought unemployment compensation, the Unemployment Agency1 coordinated her weekly benefits with her prorated weekly amount of pension payments (i.e., the amount of pension benefits plaintiff would have received weekly had she not opted for a lump-sum payment). The ensuing reduction rendered plaintiff ineligible to receive any unemployment benefits. The Employment Security…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Sun Valley Foods Co. v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Upjohn Co. v. New Hampshire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
- Wickens v. Oakwood Healthcare SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
- Oakland County Board v. Michigan Property & Casualty Guaranty Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Donajkowski v. Alpena Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by250 opinions
- Allison v. AEW CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLPMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Rovas v. SBC MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re Complaint of Rovas Against SbcMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Gilbert v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Griffith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
245 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.