Legal Opinion

Department of Natural Resources v. Seaman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1976No. Docket Nos. 55942-55944, (Calendar No. 6)PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Williams, J:

This case comes before us on appeal from three condemnation and confiscation orders entered by the Iosco Circuit Court against the defendants for acts of illegal fishing. The issues raised on appeal are: 1) does § lb(2) of Commercial Fishing Law,1 which authorizes the Director of Conservation (Director of Natural Resources) to place restrictions on commercial fishing licenses, constitute an unconstitutional delegation of legislative authority?; 2) does Rule 3 of Order No. 17 (revised)2 exceed the authority granted the Department of Natural Resources by the Legislature in the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Amos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. People v. MarxhausenMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Osius v. City of St. Clair ShoresMichigan Supreme Court · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Rovas v. SBC MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. In Re Complaint of Rovas Against SbcMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  3. City of Livonia v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Blue Cross & Blue Shield v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Consumers Power Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1999

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API