Legal Opinion

State v. Cadigan

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 16, 2007No. 050140083; A129402PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

A jury convicted defendant of harassment for slapping a police officer on the arm. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence. The state appeals, contending that the evidence was neither newly discovered nor undiscoverable through the exercise of reasonable diligence under the applicable civil procedure rule. We reverse because the trial court incorrectly concluded that the evidence was newly discovered.

Defendant and Patrick Maher lived together with their children and defendant’s adult son, Devon Ratliff. Four City of Portland Police…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Honda Motor Co. v. ObergSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Oberg v. Honda Motor Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State of Oregon v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  4. State v. ArnoldOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. FarmerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McCollum v. Kmart Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  2. State v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. State v. NefstadCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  4. State v. McCoolCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API