Honda Motor Co. v. Oberg
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens
An amendment to the Oregon Constitution prohibits judicial review of the amount of punitive damages awarded by a jury “unless the court can affirmatively say there is no evidence to support the verdict.” The question presented is whether that prohibition is consistent with the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. We hold that it is not.
I
Petitioner Honda Motor Co., Ltd., manufactured and sold the three-wheeled all-terrain vehicle that overturned while respondent was driving it, causing him severe and permanent injuries. Respondent brought suit alleging that petitioner knew or should…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by338 opinions
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 2021
- Exxon Shipping Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. MaloneTexas Supreme Court · 1998
333 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.