Legal Opinion

State v. McCool

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 2, 2008No. 990130212; A114814Published

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Defendant was convicted of various crimes following a shooting that injured multiple victims at a crowded New Year’s party. On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred in (1) denying his motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence; (2) denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained during the execution of a search warrant; (3) admitting a picture of defendant that he believes was prejudicial; (4) “not determining prosecutorial misconduct”; and (5) imposing consecutive sentences in violation of his Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial. For the reasons that follow, we…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. IceOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Michael v. CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICESSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API