State v. Farmer
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, J.
Defendant was convicted of murder with a firearm. ORS 163.115. He appeals after the trial comb denied his motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, namely, testimony of an eyewitness who called 9-1-1 at the time of the shooting. ORS 136.535; ORCP 64 B(4). We affirm.
We begin with a brief overview of the evidence, before turning to a more detailed review. As the victim, Monterroso, was walking down the street one evening in late January 2001, he was killed by a single gunshot to the chest. At trial, the evidence against defendant included the following testimony: a witness…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McCathern v. Toyota Motor Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Far West Landscaping, Inc. v. Pacific Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
- State of Oregon v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
- State v. ArnoldOregon Supreme Court · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Farmer v. PremoOregon Supreme Court · 2018
- Farmer v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. CadiganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Wah Chang v. PacifiCorpCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Greenwood Products, Inc. v. Greenwood Forest Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.